Review



i meos2 paxillin 22  (Addgene inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Addgene inc is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 92

    Structured Review

    Addgene inc i meos2 paxillin 22
    I Meos2 Paxillin 22, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 4 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/i meos2 paxillin 22/product/Addgene inc
    Average 92 stars, based on 4 article reviews
    i meos2 paxillin 22 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    92/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    99
    Bio-Techne corporation paxilline
    Paxilline, supplied by Bio-Techne corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/paxilline/product/Bio-Techne corporation
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    paxilline - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Zymo Research paxillin mrna
    Paxillin Mrna, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/paxillin mrna/product/Zymo Research
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    paxillin mrna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology paxillin
    Schematic illustration of the NIR-responsive dynamic wrinkle platform for the non-invasive harvesting of pre-primed cell sheets and their application in volumetric muscle loss (VML) repair. (A) The process of obtaining and applying pre-conditioned cell sheets for VML repair. (B) NIR-triggered dynamic reconfiguration of the wrinkle topography remotely switches the interfacial adhesion state. (C) This reconfiguration alters cellular mechanotransduction and focal adhesion density, leading to cell sheet detachment when the interfacial mechanical force (Fm) surpasses the cell-substrate adhesion force (Fc). (D) Immunofluorescence staining of focal adhesion-related markers (integrin β1, <t>talin,</t> <t>pFAK(Y397),</t> <t>paxillin,</t> and YAP/TAZ) and cytoskeleton in cells under control and mechanical stimulation conditions.
    Paxillin, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/paxillin/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    paxillin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Charles River Laboratories paxillin immunohistochemistry hex gfp stud males
    (A) Diagram of E5.5 mouse embryo; Epi = epiblast, ExE = extra-embryonic ectoderm, EPC = ectoplacental cone, emVE = embryonic visceral endoderm, exVE = extra-embryonic visceral endoderm, DVE = distal visceral endoderm. (A’) Lateral view of example E5.5 <t>Hex-GFP:mem-tdTomato</t> embryo at two time-points, imaged using a ZEISS Z.1 light-sheet at a 10-minute interval. MIP = max intensity projection. Scale bar = 50 μm. (B) Polar geodesic projection of the apical VE surface of embryo in A’ . Re-projections enable visualisation of entire VE and the application of sophisticated motion analysis tools to analyse time-lapse data. Dotted line shows position of emVE-exVE boundary – the limit of DVE cell migration. Blue cross = distal tip. (C) Overview of VE motion-tracking pipeline for quantitative analysis of time-lapse data-set. (D’-D’’) Automatic staging of DVE migration from superpixel-based motion-tracking. (D) VE superpixel motion tracking on VE polar projection; red arrows show motion-flow vectors. DVE-core motion highlighted in green. Dotted line shows mean consensus angle vector of DVE which is used to align embryos along their A-P axis. The persistence of motion direction d direct of DVE was separated from the surrounding VE. (D’’) The motion persistence of DVE showed three phases; 1) pre-migration/initiation, 2) migration to boundary, 3) post-boundary, as shown in the max intensity projections. (D’’’) Example embryo showing last timepoint of each phase. (E) A flow-like pattern of motion across the VE was observed by superpixel motion tracking. Colours denote mean vector angle. (F) To track sub-regions of the VE, a deformable grid was seeded at the start of each phase. By tracking the motion within each sub-region the grid becomes deformed and multiple parameters are analysed. (F’) To quantify parameters and to combine data from across embryos, 2D tracking data is converted back to 3D coordinate-space for analysis which can be summarised in a multi-embryo polar plot. Note re-projections have no scale bar as they are non-linear.
    Paxillin Immunohistochemistry Hex Gfp Stud Males, supplied by Charles River Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/paxillin immunohistochemistry hex gfp stud males/product/Charles River Laboratories
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    paxillin immunohistochemistry hex gfp stud males - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc paxillin
    (A) Diagram of E5.5 mouse embryo; Epi = epiblast, ExE = extra-embryonic ectoderm, EPC = ectoplacental cone, emVE = embryonic visceral endoderm, exVE = extra-embryonic visceral endoderm, DVE = distal visceral endoderm. (A’) Lateral view of example E5.5 <t>Hex-GFP:mem-tdTomato</t> embryo at two time-points, imaged using a ZEISS Z.1 light-sheet at a 10-minute interval. MIP = max intensity projection. Scale bar = 50 μm. (B) Polar geodesic projection of the apical VE surface of embryo in A’ . Re-projections enable visualisation of entire VE and the application of sophisticated motion analysis tools to analyse time-lapse data. Dotted line shows position of emVE-exVE boundary – the limit of DVE cell migration. Blue cross = distal tip. (C) Overview of VE motion-tracking pipeline for quantitative analysis of time-lapse data-set. (D’-D’’) Automatic staging of DVE migration from superpixel-based motion-tracking. (D) VE superpixel motion tracking on VE polar projection; red arrows show motion-flow vectors. DVE-core motion highlighted in green. Dotted line shows mean consensus angle vector of DVE which is used to align embryos along their A-P axis. The persistence of motion direction d direct of DVE was separated from the surrounding VE. (D’’) The motion persistence of DVE showed three phases; 1) pre-migration/initiation, 2) migration to boundary, 3) post-boundary, as shown in the max intensity projections. (D’’’) Example embryo showing last timepoint of each phase. (E) A flow-like pattern of motion across the VE was observed by superpixel motion tracking. Colours denote mean vector angle. (F) To track sub-regions of the VE, a deformable grid was seeded at the start of each phase. By tracking the motion within each sub-region the grid becomes deformed and multiple parameters are analysed. (F’) To quantify parameters and to combine data from across embryos, 2D tracking data is converted back to 3D coordinate-space for analysis which can be summarised in a multi-embryo polar plot. Note re-projections have no scale bar as they are non-linear.
    Paxillin, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/paxillin/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    paxillin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Proteintech anti paxillin
    (A) Diagram of E5.5 mouse embryo; Epi = epiblast, ExE = extra-embryonic ectoderm, EPC = ectoplacental cone, emVE = embryonic visceral endoderm, exVE = extra-embryonic visceral endoderm, DVE = distal visceral endoderm. (A’) Lateral view of example E5.5 <t>Hex-GFP:mem-tdTomato</t> embryo at two time-points, imaged using a ZEISS Z.1 light-sheet at a 10-minute interval. MIP = max intensity projection. Scale bar = 50 μm. (B) Polar geodesic projection of the apical VE surface of embryo in A’ . Re-projections enable visualisation of entire VE and the application of sophisticated motion analysis tools to analyse time-lapse data. Dotted line shows position of emVE-exVE boundary – the limit of DVE cell migration. Blue cross = distal tip. (C) Overview of VE motion-tracking pipeline for quantitative analysis of time-lapse data-set. (D’-D’’) Automatic staging of DVE migration from superpixel-based motion-tracking. (D) VE superpixel motion tracking on VE polar projection; red arrows show motion-flow vectors. DVE-core motion highlighted in green. Dotted line shows mean consensus angle vector of DVE which is used to align embryos along their A-P axis. The persistence of motion direction d direct of DVE was separated from the surrounding VE. (D’’) The motion persistence of DVE showed three phases; 1) pre-migration/initiation, 2) migration to boundary, 3) post-boundary, as shown in the max intensity projections. (D’’’) Example embryo showing last timepoint of each phase. (E) A flow-like pattern of motion across the VE was observed by superpixel motion tracking. Colours denote mean vector angle. (F) To track sub-regions of the VE, a deformable grid was seeded at the start of each phase. By tracking the motion within each sub-region the grid becomes deformed and multiple parameters are analysed. (F’) To quantify parameters and to combine data from across embryos, 2D tracking data is converted back to 3D coordinate-space for analysis which can be summarised in a multi-embryo polar plot. Note re-projections have no scale bar as they are non-linear.
    Anti Paxillin, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti paxillin/product/Proteintech
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti paxillin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc antibody against phospho paxillin
    (A) Diagram of E5.5 mouse embryo; Epi = epiblast, ExE = extra-embryonic ectoderm, EPC = ectoplacental cone, emVE = embryonic visceral endoderm, exVE = extra-embryonic visceral endoderm, DVE = distal visceral endoderm. (A’) Lateral view of example E5.5 <t>Hex-GFP:mem-tdTomato</t> embryo at two time-points, imaged using a ZEISS Z.1 light-sheet at a 10-minute interval. MIP = max intensity projection. Scale bar = 50 μm. (B) Polar geodesic projection of the apical VE surface of embryo in A’ . Re-projections enable visualisation of entire VE and the application of sophisticated motion analysis tools to analyse time-lapse data. Dotted line shows position of emVE-exVE boundary – the limit of DVE cell migration. Blue cross = distal tip. (C) Overview of VE motion-tracking pipeline for quantitative analysis of time-lapse data-set. (D’-D’’) Automatic staging of DVE migration from superpixel-based motion-tracking. (D) VE superpixel motion tracking on VE polar projection; red arrows show motion-flow vectors. DVE-core motion highlighted in green. Dotted line shows mean consensus angle vector of DVE which is used to align embryos along their A-P axis. The persistence of motion direction d direct of DVE was separated from the surrounding VE. (D’’) The motion persistence of DVE showed three phases; 1) pre-migration/initiation, 2) migration to boundary, 3) post-boundary, as shown in the max intensity projections. (D’’’) Example embryo showing last timepoint of each phase. (E) A flow-like pattern of motion across the VE was observed by superpixel motion tracking. Colours denote mean vector angle. (F) To track sub-regions of the VE, a deformable grid was seeded at the start of each phase. By tracking the motion within each sub-region the grid becomes deformed and multiple parameters are analysed. (F’) To quantify parameters and to combine data from across embryos, 2D tracking data is converted back to 3D coordinate-space for analysis which can be summarised in a multi-embryo polar plot. Note re-projections have no scale bar as they are non-linear.
    Antibody Against Phospho Paxillin, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/antibody against phospho paxillin/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    antibody against phospho paxillin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology anti pxn primary antibody
    (A) Diagram of E5.5 mouse embryo; Epi = epiblast, ExE = extra-embryonic ectoderm, EPC = ectoplacental cone, emVE = embryonic visceral endoderm, exVE = extra-embryonic visceral endoderm, DVE = distal visceral endoderm. (A’) Lateral view of example E5.5 <t>Hex-GFP:mem-tdTomato</t> embryo at two time-points, imaged using a ZEISS Z.1 light-sheet at a 10-minute interval. MIP = max intensity projection. Scale bar = 50 μm. (B) Polar geodesic projection of the apical VE surface of embryo in A’ . Re-projections enable visualisation of entire VE and the application of sophisticated motion analysis tools to analyse time-lapse data. Dotted line shows position of emVE-exVE boundary – the limit of DVE cell migration. Blue cross = distal tip. (C) Overview of VE motion-tracking pipeline for quantitative analysis of time-lapse data-set. (D’-D’’) Automatic staging of DVE migration from superpixel-based motion-tracking. (D) VE superpixel motion tracking on VE polar projection; red arrows show motion-flow vectors. DVE-core motion highlighted in green. Dotted line shows mean consensus angle vector of DVE which is used to align embryos along their A-P axis. The persistence of motion direction d direct of DVE was separated from the surrounding VE. (D’’) The motion persistence of DVE showed three phases; 1) pre-migration/initiation, 2) migration to boundary, 3) post-boundary, as shown in the max intensity projections. (D’’’) Example embryo showing last timepoint of each phase. (E) A flow-like pattern of motion across the VE was observed by superpixel motion tracking. Colours denote mean vector angle. (F) To track sub-regions of the VE, a deformable grid was seeded at the start of each phase. By tracking the motion within each sub-region the grid becomes deformed and multiple parameters are analysed. (F’) To quantify parameters and to combine data from across embryos, 2D tracking data is converted back to 3D coordinate-space for analysis which can be summarised in a multi-embryo polar plot. Note re-projections have no scale bar as they are non-linear.
    Anti Pxn Primary Antibody, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti pxn primary antibody/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti pxn primary antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    92
    Addgene inc i meos2 paxillin 22
    (A) Diagram of E5.5 mouse embryo; Epi = epiblast, ExE = extra-embryonic ectoderm, EPC = ectoplacental cone, emVE = embryonic visceral endoderm, exVE = extra-embryonic visceral endoderm, DVE = distal visceral endoderm. (A’) Lateral view of example E5.5 <t>Hex-GFP:mem-tdTomato</t> embryo at two time-points, imaged using a ZEISS Z.1 light-sheet at a 10-minute interval. MIP = max intensity projection. Scale bar = 50 μm. (B) Polar geodesic projection of the apical VE surface of embryo in A’ . Re-projections enable visualisation of entire VE and the application of sophisticated motion analysis tools to analyse time-lapse data. Dotted line shows position of emVE-exVE boundary – the limit of DVE cell migration. Blue cross = distal tip. (C) Overview of VE motion-tracking pipeline for quantitative analysis of time-lapse data-set. (D’-D’’) Automatic staging of DVE migration from superpixel-based motion-tracking. (D) VE superpixel motion tracking on VE polar projection; red arrows show motion-flow vectors. DVE-core motion highlighted in green. Dotted line shows mean consensus angle vector of DVE which is used to align embryos along their A-P axis. The persistence of motion direction d direct of DVE was separated from the surrounding VE. (D’’) The motion persistence of DVE showed three phases; 1) pre-migration/initiation, 2) migration to boundary, 3) post-boundary, as shown in the max intensity projections. (D’’’) Example embryo showing last timepoint of each phase. (E) A flow-like pattern of motion across the VE was observed by superpixel motion tracking. Colours denote mean vector angle. (F) To track sub-regions of the VE, a deformable grid was seeded at the start of each phase. By tracking the motion within each sub-region the grid becomes deformed and multiple parameters are analysed. (F’) To quantify parameters and to combine data from across embryos, 2D tracking data is converted back to 3D coordinate-space for analysis which can be summarised in a multi-embryo polar plot. Note re-projections have no scale bar as they are non-linear.
    I Meos2 Paxillin 22, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/i meos2 paxillin 22/product/Addgene inc
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    i meos2 paxillin 22 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit anti phospho paxillin
    (A) Diagram of E5.5 mouse embryo; Epi = epiblast, ExE = extra-embryonic ectoderm, EPC = ectoplacental cone, emVE = embryonic visceral endoderm, exVE = extra-embryonic visceral endoderm, DVE = distal visceral endoderm. (A’) Lateral view of example E5.5 <t>Hex-GFP:mem-tdTomato</t> embryo at two time-points, imaged using a ZEISS Z.1 light-sheet at a 10-minute interval. MIP = max intensity projection. Scale bar = 50 μm. (B) Polar geodesic projection of the apical VE surface of embryo in A’ . Re-projections enable visualisation of entire VE and the application of sophisticated motion analysis tools to analyse time-lapse data. Dotted line shows position of emVE-exVE boundary – the limit of DVE cell migration. Blue cross = distal tip. (C) Overview of VE motion-tracking pipeline for quantitative analysis of time-lapse data-set. (D’-D’’) Automatic staging of DVE migration from superpixel-based motion-tracking. (D) VE superpixel motion tracking on VE polar projection; red arrows show motion-flow vectors. DVE-core motion highlighted in green. Dotted line shows mean consensus angle vector of DVE which is used to align embryos along their A-P axis. The persistence of motion direction d direct of DVE was separated from the surrounding VE. (D’’) The motion persistence of DVE showed three phases; 1) pre-migration/initiation, 2) migration to boundary, 3) post-boundary, as shown in the max intensity projections. (D’’’) Example embryo showing last timepoint of each phase. (E) A flow-like pattern of motion across the VE was observed by superpixel motion tracking. Colours denote mean vector angle. (F) To track sub-regions of the VE, a deformable grid was seeded at the start of each phase. By tracking the motion within each sub-region the grid becomes deformed and multiple parameters are analysed. (F’) To quantify parameters and to combine data from across embryos, 2D tracking data is converted back to 3D coordinate-space for analysis which can be summarised in a multi-embryo polar plot. Note re-projections have no scale bar as they are non-linear.
    Rabbit Anti Phospho Paxillin, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti phospho paxillin/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti phospho paxillin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Schematic illustration of the NIR-responsive dynamic wrinkle platform for the non-invasive harvesting of pre-primed cell sheets and their application in volumetric muscle loss (VML) repair. (A) The process of obtaining and applying pre-conditioned cell sheets for VML repair. (B) NIR-triggered dynamic reconfiguration of the wrinkle topography remotely switches the interfacial adhesion state. (C) This reconfiguration alters cellular mechanotransduction and focal adhesion density, leading to cell sheet detachment when the interfacial mechanical force (Fm) surpasses the cell-substrate adhesion force (Fc). (D) Immunofluorescence staining of focal adhesion-related markers (integrin β1, talin, pFAK(Y397), paxillin, and YAP/TAZ) and cytoskeleton in cells under control and mechanical stimulation conditions.

    Journal: Bioactive Materials

    Article Title: Pre-priming cell sheet therapy enabled by dynamic wrinkled electroactive substrate for muscle reconstruction

    doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.01.046

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Schematic illustration of the NIR-responsive dynamic wrinkle platform for the non-invasive harvesting of pre-primed cell sheets and their application in volumetric muscle loss (VML) repair. (A) The process of obtaining and applying pre-conditioned cell sheets for VML repair. (B) NIR-triggered dynamic reconfiguration of the wrinkle topography remotely switches the interfacial adhesion state. (C) This reconfiguration alters cellular mechanotransduction and focal adhesion density, leading to cell sheet detachment when the interfacial mechanical force (Fm) surpasses the cell-substrate adhesion force (Fc). (D) Immunofluorescence staining of focal adhesion-related markers (integrin β1, talin, pFAK(Y397), paxillin, and YAP/TAZ) and cytoskeleton in cells under control and mechanical stimulation conditions.

    Article Snippet: FAK Antibody (sc-271126), pFAK(Y3978556s), talin (sc: 4021s), paxillin (sc: 365379), integrin β1 (sc: 374429), and YAP (cst: 14074s), TAZ (cst: 83669s) were ordered from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.

    Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Staining, Control

    Immunofluorescence staining of focal adhesion-related markers and cytoskeleton in cells under control and mechanical stimulation conditions. Left (Control group): Immunofluorescence staining shows focal adhesion-associated proteins (green channels). These correspond to integrin β1(A), talin (B), pFAK/FAK (C), paxillin (D), YAP (E), and TAZ (F) in each row. F-actin and FAK are shown in the red channel. The rightmost column of each row displays merged images. These integrate focal adhesion marker signals (green), F-actin (red), and DAPI-stained nuclei (blue). Yellow indicates co-localization of focal adhesion markers and F-actin. Right (After mechanical stimulation group): Immunofluorescence staining displays the same set of focal adhesion-related proteins and F-actin in cells after mechanical stimulation. Merged images are presented in the same format as the control group.

    Journal: Bioactive Materials

    Article Title: Pre-priming cell sheet therapy enabled by dynamic wrinkled electroactive substrate for muscle reconstruction

    doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.01.046

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Immunofluorescence staining of focal adhesion-related markers and cytoskeleton in cells under control and mechanical stimulation conditions. Left (Control group): Immunofluorescence staining shows focal adhesion-associated proteins (green channels). These correspond to integrin β1(A), talin (B), pFAK/FAK (C), paxillin (D), YAP (E), and TAZ (F) in each row. F-actin and FAK are shown in the red channel. The rightmost column of each row displays merged images. These integrate focal adhesion marker signals (green), F-actin (red), and DAPI-stained nuclei (blue). Yellow indicates co-localization of focal adhesion markers and F-actin. Right (After mechanical stimulation group): Immunofluorescence staining displays the same set of focal adhesion-related proteins and F-actin in cells after mechanical stimulation. Merged images are presented in the same format as the control group.

    Article Snippet: FAK Antibody (sc-271126), pFAK(Y3978556s), talin (sc: 4021s), paxillin (sc: 365379), integrin β1 (sc: 374429), and YAP (cst: 14074s), TAZ (cst: 83669s) were ordered from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.

    Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Staining, Control, Marker

    (A) Diagram of E5.5 mouse embryo; Epi = epiblast, ExE = extra-embryonic ectoderm, EPC = ectoplacental cone, emVE = embryonic visceral endoderm, exVE = extra-embryonic visceral endoderm, DVE = distal visceral endoderm. (A’) Lateral view of example E5.5 Hex-GFP:mem-tdTomato embryo at two time-points, imaged using a ZEISS Z.1 light-sheet at a 10-minute interval. MIP = max intensity projection. Scale bar = 50 μm. (B) Polar geodesic projection of the apical VE surface of embryo in A’ . Re-projections enable visualisation of entire VE and the application of sophisticated motion analysis tools to analyse time-lapse data. Dotted line shows position of emVE-exVE boundary – the limit of DVE cell migration. Blue cross = distal tip. (C) Overview of VE motion-tracking pipeline for quantitative analysis of time-lapse data-set. (D’-D’’) Automatic staging of DVE migration from superpixel-based motion-tracking. (D) VE superpixel motion tracking on VE polar projection; red arrows show motion-flow vectors. DVE-core motion highlighted in green. Dotted line shows mean consensus angle vector of DVE which is used to align embryos along their A-P axis. The persistence of motion direction d direct of DVE was separated from the surrounding VE. (D’’) The motion persistence of DVE showed three phases; 1) pre-migration/initiation, 2) migration to boundary, 3) post-boundary, as shown in the max intensity projections. (D’’’) Example embryo showing last timepoint of each phase. (E) A flow-like pattern of motion across the VE was observed by superpixel motion tracking. Colours denote mean vector angle. (F) To track sub-regions of the VE, a deformable grid was seeded at the start of each phase. By tracking the motion within each sub-region the grid becomes deformed and multiple parameters are analysed. (F’) To quantify parameters and to combine data from across embryos, 2D tracking data is converted back to 3D coordinate-space for analysis which can be summarised in a multi-embryo polar plot. Note re-projections have no scale bar as they are non-linear.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Quantitative multi-scale morphodynamic analysis reveals ratchet-like collective DVE migration and epiblast retrograde cell flow during anterior patterning in the mouse embryo

    doi: 10.64898/2026.04.24.720339

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Diagram of E5.5 mouse embryo; Epi = epiblast, ExE = extra-embryonic ectoderm, EPC = ectoplacental cone, emVE = embryonic visceral endoderm, exVE = extra-embryonic visceral endoderm, DVE = distal visceral endoderm. (A’) Lateral view of example E5.5 Hex-GFP:mem-tdTomato embryo at two time-points, imaged using a ZEISS Z.1 light-sheet at a 10-minute interval. MIP = max intensity projection. Scale bar = 50 μm. (B) Polar geodesic projection of the apical VE surface of embryo in A’ . Re-projections enable visualisation of entire VE and the application of sophisticated motion analysis tools to analyse time-lapse data. Dotted line shows position of emVE-exVE boundary – the limit of DVE cell migration. Blue cross = distal tip. (C) Overview of VE motion-tracking pipeline for quantitative analysis of time-lapse data-set. (D’-D’’) Automatic staging of DVE migration from superpixel-based motion-tracking. (D) VE superpixel motion tracking on VE polar projection; red arrows show motion-flow vectors. DVE-core motion highlighted in green. Dotted line shows mean consensus angle vector of DVE which is used to align embryos along their A-P axis. The persistence of motion direction d direct of DVE was separated from the surrounding VE. (D’’) The motion persistence of DVE showed three phases; 1) pre-migration/initiation, 2) migration to boundary, 3) post-boundary, as shown in the max intensity projections. (D’’’) Example embryo showing last timepoint of each phase. (E) A flow-like pattern of motion across the VE was observed by superpixel motion tracking. Colours denote mean vector angle. (F) To track sub-regions of the VE, a deformable grid was seeded at the start of each phase. By tracking the motion within each sub-region the grid becomes deformed and multiple parameters are analysed. (F’) To quantify parameters and to combine data from across embryos, 2D tracking data is converted back to 3D coordinate-space for analysis which can be summarised in a multi-embryo polar plot. Note re-projections have no scale bar as they are non-linear.

    Article Snippet: For Paxillin immunohistochemistry Hex-GFP stud males were crossed with CD1 females (Charles River) and dissected at E5.5.

    Techniques: Migration, Plasmid Preparation

    (A) Example Hex-GFP; membrane td-tomato, (B) Lifeact-GFP, and (C) mTmG crossed with Ttr-Cre line. Each panel shows a max intensity projection, mid-sagittal optical section, and rectangular and polar projections of the apical surface of the VE (upper panels) and basal surface of the epiblast (lower panels). We note that the Lifeact-GFP mouse line consistently showed an almost complete absence of fluorescence signal in the ExE tissue. This does not reflect the level of F-actin in the ExE as shown by immunofluorescent staining. Note projections have no scale bar as they are non-linear.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Quantitative multi-scale morphodynamic analysis reveals ratchet-like collective DVE migration and epiblast retrograde cell flow during anterior patterning in the mouse embryo

    doi: 10.64898/2026.04.24.720339

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Example Hex-GFP; membrane td-tomato, (B) Lifeact-GFP, and (C) mTmG crossed with Ttr-Cre line. Each panel shows a max intensity projection, mid-sagittal optical section, and rectangular and polar projections of the apical surface of the VE (upper panels) and basal surface of the epiblast (lower panels). We note that the Lifeact-GFP mouse line consistently showed an almost complete absence of fluorescence signal in the ExE tissue. This does not reflect the level of F-actin in the ExE as shown by immunofluorescent staining. Note projections have no scale bar as they are non-linear.

    Article Snippet: For Paxillin immunohistochemistry Hex-GFP stud males were crossed with CD1 females (Charles River) and dissected at E5.5.

    Techniques: Membrane, Fluorescence, Staining

    (A) Example Hex-GFP; membrane td-tomato, (B) Lifeact-GFP, and (C) mTmG crossed with Ttr-Cre line. Each panel shows superpixel tracks on a rectangular geodesic projection and polar geodesic projections of the apical surface of the VE. Tracks are coloured by the direction of motion. Note re-projections have no scale bar as they are non-linear.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Quantitative multi-scale morphodynamic analysis reveals ratchet-like collective DVE migration and epiblast retrograde cell flow during anterior patterning in the mouse embryo

    doi: 10.64898/2026.04.24.720339

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Example Hex-GFP; membrane td-tomato, (B) Lifeact-GFP, and (C) mTmG crossed with Ttr-Cre line. Each panel shows superpixel tracks on a rectangular geodesic projection and polar geodesic projections of the apical surface of the VE. Tracks are coloured by the direction of motion. Note re-projections have no scale bar as they are non-linear.

    Article Snippet: For Paxillin immunohistochemistry Hex-GFP stud males were crossed with CD1 females (Charles River) and dissected at E5.5.

    Techniques: Membrane

    (A) Overview of method for tracking the motion of VE sub-regions using superpixel motion tracking. (B) Example Hex-GFP;mem-tdTomato embryo showing the start, middle and end of migration in a geodesic polar projection. (C) Superpixel motion tracking of embryo in B. As the tissue moves the grid is deformed, enabling analysis of the tissue behaviour within each tissue sub-region and comparison across embryos. (D) Final timepoint of superpixel motion tracking from all (n = 21) embryos in this dataset. All data is converted back to 3D coordinates for analysis. For each stage (pre-migration/initiation, migration, post-boundary) the grid is re-set and re-tracked by motion behaviour. Note re-projections have no scale bar as they are non-linear. HXMT = Hex-GFP;membrane-tdTomato, LA = Lifeact-GFP, TTRmTMG = mTmG;Ttr-Cre embryo.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Quantitative multi-scale morphodynamic analysis reveals ratchet-like collective DVE migration and epiblast retrograde cell flow during anterior patterning in the mouse embryo

    doi: 10.64898/2026.04.24.720339

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Overview of method for tracking the motion of VE sub-regions using superpixel motion tracking. (B) Example Hex-GFP;mem-tdTomato embryo showing the start, middle and end of migration in a geodesic polar projection. (C) Superpixel motion tracking of embryo in B. As the tissue moves the grid is deformed, enabling analysis of the tissue behaviour within each tissue sub-region and comparison across embryos. (D) Final timepoint of superpixel motion tracking from all (n = 21) embryos in this dataset. All data is converted back to 3D coordinates for analysis. For each stage (pre-migration/initiation, migration, post-boundary) the grid is re-set and re-tracked by motion behaviour. Note re-projections have no scale bar as they are non-linear. HXMT = Hex-GFP;membrane-tdTomato, LA = Lifeact-GFP, TTRmTMG = mTmG;Ttr-Cre embryo.

    Article Snippet: For Paxillin immunohistochemistry Hex-GFP stud males were crossed with CD1 females (Charles River) and dissected at E5.5.

    Techniques: Migration, Comparison, Membrane

    (A) Superpixel motion tracking of the emVE and exVE tissues confirms that emVE is significantly more active (higher mean speed and total speed) than the exVE (for both comparisons; Student’s t -test, p =<0.001). (B) Comparison of the anterior emVE and posterior emVE that are immediately adjacent to the DVE during the initiation of migration phase. There is no significant difference in motion (mean speed, total speed or anteriorwards velocity) or tissue area change (area fold change or area rate change) between these two tissue regions (all comparisons; Student’s t -test, p =>0.05). (C) Superpixel tracking of the distal VE during each phase shows that the migration phase has the highest anteriorwards velocity (one-way ANOVA, p =<0.01, followed by Tukey’s HSD Test on initiation of migration vs. migration (p =<0.001), migration vs post-boundary ( p =<0.001), initiation of migration vs post-boundary ( p =>0.05)). In the post-boundary phase the distal VE region contains the nascent Hex-GFP cells that continue to migrate anteriorly, but do so at a lower speed than the initial DVE.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Quantitative multi-scale morphodynamic analysis reveals ratchet-like collective DVE migration and epiblast retrograde cell flow during anterior patterning in the mouse embryo

    doi: 10.64898/2026.04.24.720339

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Superpixel motion tracking of the emVE and exVE tissues confirms that emVE is significantly more active (higher mean speed and total speed) than the exVE (for both comparisons; Student’s t -test, p =<0.001). (B) Comparison of the anterior emVE and posterior emVE that are immediately adjacent to the DVE during the initiation of migration phase. There is no significant difference in motion (mean speed, total speed or anteriorwards velocity) or tissue area change (area fold change or area rate change) between these two tissue regions (all comparisons; Student’s t -test, p =>0.05). (C) Superpixel tracking of the distal VE during each phase shows that the migration phase has the highest anteriorwards velocity (one-way ANOVA, p =<0.01, followed by Tukey’s HSD Test on initiation of migration vs. migration (p =<0.001), migration vs post-boundary ( p =<0.001), initiation of migration vs post-boundary ( p =>0.05)). In the post-boundary phase the distal VE region contains the nascent Hex-GFP cells that continue to migrate anteriorly, but do so at a lower speed than the initial DVE.

    Article Snippet: For Paxillin immunohistochemistry Hex-GFP stud males were crossed with CD1 females (Charles River) and dissected at E5.5.

    Techniques: Comparison, Migration

    (A) Overview of cell movement analysis in cell tracked Lifeact-GFP time-lapse data-set, imaged at a 5-minute interval. Each cell vector angle is assessed then weighted by its velocity. (A’) Example embryo showing DVE cell tracks (cyan) on 2D polar geodesic projection. Red dotted line denotes emVE-exVE boundary. (A’’) Heat-map of weighted angle histogram of DVE cell velocity where each cell’s contribution is weighted by its speed. Cell vectors are in 22.5° bins for the +/-1 hour from onset of collective migration. Note the increase in coordinated anteriorward motion at the onset of the migration phase (white dashed line). (B) Graph showing Rayleigh distribution statistic of DVE cell tracks at pre-migration/initiation and migration phases, which shows the increase in coordination in cell vectors at the onset of migration (0 = random distribution, 1 = uniform distribution). (C) 2D geodesic polar projection of an example E5.5 Hex-GFP:mem-tdTomato embryo imaged every 10 minutes for 11 hours. Digitally extracting the A-P midline (coloured vertical line in C) throughout the time-lapse enables a kymograph to be plotted. (C’) Kymograph of the Hex-GFP channel along A-P mid-line of the embryo in C, showing the DVE cell population migrating collectively at the onset of the migration phase (vertical dotted line) to reach emVE-exVE boundary (horizontal dotted line). (C’’) Kymograph of superpixel motion tracking of A-P mid-line of embryo in C. Plotting anteriorwards velocity shows that the DVE movement is intermittent, undergoing start-stop behaviour (arrows). (D-D’) Graphs showing anteriorwards velocity and cumulative velocity (i.e., anteriorwards displacement/ min) of Hex-GFP population of embryo in C. In the pre-migration/initiation phase, where there is a relatively low level of directionally coordinated motion amongst DVE cells (A’’,B), there is little anteriorwards velocity. In the migration phase when directional coordination increased (A’’,B), anteriorwards velocity increases as the DVE migrated collectively (see position of Hex-GFP in D’’. t-5h - t0h). (E) Histogram of anteriorwards velocity at all timepoints from 9 Hex-GFP embryos during migration phase. In >90% of time-points Hex-GFP progresses anteriorly, with minimal posteriorwards motion. (E’) Plot showing mean time between start-stop events for each Hex-GFP embryo (n = 9); mean ratchet period was 1.13 ± 0.29 hours (mean ± stdev).

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Quantitative multi-scale morphodynamic analysis reveals ratchet-like collective DVE migration and epiblast retrograde cell flow during anterior patterning in the mouse embryo

    doi: 10.64898/2026.04.24.720339

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Overview of cell movement analysis in cell tracked Lifeact-GFP time-lapse data-set, imaged at a 5-minute interval. Each cell vector angle is assessed then weighted by its velocity. (A’) Example embryo showing DVE cell tracks (cyan) on 2D polar geodesic projection. Red dotted line denotes emVE-exVE boundary. (A’’) Heat-map of weighted angle histogram of DVE cell velocity where each cell’s contribution is weighted by its speed. Cell vectors are in 22.5° bins for the +/-1 hour from onset of collective migration. Note the increase in coordinated anteriorward motion at the onset of the migration phase (white dashed line). (B) Graph showing Rayleigh distribution statistic of DVE cell tracks at pre-migration/initiation and migration phases, which shows the increase in coordination in cell vectors at the onset of migration (0 = random distribution, 1 = uniform distribution). (C) 2D geodesic polar projection of an example E5.5 Hex-GFP:mem-tdTomato embryo imaged every 10 minutes for 11 hours. Digitally extracting the A-P midline (coloured vertical line in C) throughout the time-lapse enables a kymograph to be plotted. (C’) Kymograph of the Hex-GFP channel along A-P mid-line of the embryo in C, showing the DVE cell population migrating collectively at the onset of the migration phase (vertical dotted line) to reach emVE-exVE boundary (horizontal dotted line). (C’’) Kymograph of superpixel motion tracking of A-P mid-line of embryo in C. Plotting anteriorwards velocity shows that the DVE movement is intermittent, undergoing start-stop behaviour (arrows). (D-D’) Graphs showing anteriorwards velocity and cumulative velocity (i.e., anteriorwards displacement/ min) of Hex-GFP population of embryo in C. In the pre-migration/initiation phase, where there is a relatively low level of directionally coordinated motion amongst DVE cells (A’’,B), there is little anteriorwards velocity. In the migration phase when directional coordination increased (A’’,B), anteriorwards velocity increases as the DVE migrated collectively (see position of Hex-GFP in D’’. t-5h - t0h). (E) Histogram of anteriorwards velocity at all timepoints from 9 Hex-GFP embryos during migration phase. In >90% of time-points Hex-GFP progresses anteriorly, with minimal posteriorwards motion. (E’) Plot showing mean time between start-stop events for each Hex-GFP embryo (n = 9); mean ratchet period was 1.13 ± 0.29 hours (mean ± stdev).

    Article Snippet: For Paxillin immunohistochemistry Hex-GFP stud males were crossed with CD1 females (Charles River) and dissected at E5.5.

    Techniques: Plasmid Preparation, Migration

    (A) Whole-mount immunofluorescence of PAXILLIN in an example E5.5 embryo, showing a maximum intensity projection (MIP) and single z-section of the embryonic-half of the embryo. PAXILLIN is enriched along the basal surface of the VE and epiblast. (B) Diagram of Cre-inducible EGFP-PAXILLIN reporter line. Ttr-Cre is expressed specifically in the VE and Sox2-Cre in the epiblast. (C) Example live imaging of E5.5 Ttr-Cre EGFP-PAXILLIN embryo and (D) Sox2-Cre EGFP-PAXILLIN embryo, showing the basal localisation of the protein throughout the VE and epiblast. A total of n = 15 embryos were imaged for both crosses. All scale bars 25 μm.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Quantitative multi-scale morphodynamic analysis reveals ratchet-like collective DVE migration and epiblast retrograde cell flow during anterior patterning in the mouse embryo

    doi: 10.64898/2026.04.24.720339

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Whole-mount immunofluorescence of PAXILLIN in an example E5.5 embryo, showing a maximum intensity projection (MIP) and single z-section of the embryonic-half of the embryo. PAXILLIN is enriched along the basal surface of the VE and epiblast. (B) Diagram of Cre-inducible EGFP-PAXILLIN reporter line. Ttr-Cre is expressed specifically in the VE and Sox2-Cre in the epiblast. (C) Example live imaging of E5.5 Ttr-Cre EGFP-PAXILLIN embryo and (D) Sox2-Cre EGFP-PAXILLIN embryo, showing the basal localisation of the protein throughout the VE and epiblast. A total of n = 15 embryos were imaged for both crosses. All scale bars 25 μm.

    Article Snippet: For Paxillin immunohistochemistry Hex-GFP stud males were crossed with CD1 females (Charles River) and dissected at E5.5.

    Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Imaging